Diffuse Control of Constitutionality in Class Actions

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.11669994

Keywords:

Constitutional control, collective actions, meta-individual rights, jurisdiction of the Supreme Federal Court.

Abstract

The emergence of judicial review of constitutionality occurred in 1803, with its widespread implementation in the United States. Later, a new paradigmatic model was added to this system, implemented by Austria in 1920, the so-called abstract-concentrated review. The protection of collective rights (lato sensu), however, is even more recent. Its origin is linked to the revealing ideas of MAURO CAPPELLETTI and, in Brazil, it was only in 1985, with the Public Civil Action Law, that it was possible to effectively speak of a comprehensive protection of collective rights, and it should be noted that its scope was expanded by the enactment of the Consumer Protection Code. One of the main distinguishing characteristics of the protection of these rights in relation to the traditional individual protection lies in the effects of the final decision. In fact, in the event that the requested protection is upheld, the decision becomes res judicata erga omnes.

Author Biography

  • André Ramos Tavares, Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo

    PhD in State Law from the Pontifical Catholic University of São Paulo – PUC/SP. Professor of the Stricto Sensu Postgraduate Program in Law at PUC/SP. Professor of the Postgraduate Course at the Higher School of Constitutional Law (ESDC).

Published

2003-06-30

Issue

Section

Artigos

How to Cite

TAVARES, André Ramos. Diffuse Control of Constitutionality in Class Actions. Revista Brasileira de Direito Constitucional, [S. l.], v. 1, p. 107–125, 2003. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.11669994. Disponível em: https://www.rbdc.com.br/revista/article/view/28. Acesso em: 17 nov. 2025.