The apparent regulatory conflict regarding the assessment of exposure to the hydrocarbon benzene in occupational environment activities: application of the quantitative or qualitative method?

Authors

  • Arthur Miguel Ferreira Lawand Santa Cecília University Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62530/rbdcv24n02p61

Keywords:

Occupational environment, Exposure to harmful agent, Classification, Quantitative or qualitative criterion

Abstract

This article aims to analyze the regulation and, secondarily, the potential social security impacts of the method used to assess benzene exposure in the occupational environment. The gray area of interpretive understandings and the proliferation of disparate norms have led to the judicialization of the issue, particularly regarding whether benzene exposure should be recorded in the social security occupational profile for purposes of claiming special retirement benefits. Through normative research with a qualitative approach, the documentary corpus on the subject is examined in order to foster reflection on the criterion that administrative and judicial authorities should currently apply and its possible consequences. To reinforce the argument, this study also adds a purely comparative analysis of foreign regulation concerning benzene in light of the methodology adopted by other international hygiene institutes, such as the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, which is the U.S. agency responsible for recommendations on preventing work-related injuries and illnesses.

Author Biography

  • Arthur Miguel Ferreira Lawand, Santa Cecília University

    Master’s student in Health Law at the Stricto Sensu Graduate Program of Universidade Santa Cecília (UNISANTA). Law graduate from the Catholic University of Santos. Postgraduate in Applied Health Law from the Institute of Applied Health Law (IDISA). Public attorney at Petróleo Brasileiro S.A. (PETROBRAS).

References

BRASIL, Tribunal Superior do Trabalho, Ag: 100860820145150063. Data de Julgamento: 30/06/2021. Data de Publicação: 02/07/2021.

BRASIL, Tribunal Superior do Trabalho. AIRR: 00102212020155150084, Data de Publicação: 09/11/2022.

BRASIL. Decreto nº 2.172, de 1997, que aprova o Anexo IV da RPBS (ANEXO H).

BRASIL. Decreto nº 3.048, de 1999, que aprova o Anexo IV da RPBS (ANEXO H).

BRASIL. Decreto nº 53.831, de 25/03/1964, Código 1.0.0 do Quadro Anexo (ANEXO F).

BRASIL. Decreto nº 83.080, de 24/01/1979, que aprova o Anexo I do RBPS (Regulamento dos Benefícios da Previdência Social) (ANEXO G).

BRASIL. INSS. Despacho Decisório nº 479/DIRSAT/INSS, de 25 de setembro de 2018.

BRASIL. INSS. Instrução Normativaº 77, de 21/01/2015, que estabelece rotinas para agilizar e uniformizar o reconhecimento de direitos dos segurados e beneficiários da Previdência Social, com observância dos princípios estabelecidos no art. 37 da Constituição Federal de 1988.

BRASIL. MTP. Instrução Normativa MTP Nº 2 de 08/11/2021, QUE Dispõe sobre os procedimentos a serem observados pela Auditoria-Fiscal do Trabalho nas situações elencadas.

GONÇALVES, Edwar Abreu. Manual de segurança e saúde do trabalho. 4ª ed. São Paulo: Ltr, 2008.

SILVA, Homero Batista Mateus da. Direito do Trabalho Aplicado: saúde do trabalho e profissões regulamentadas. São Paulo: Thomson Reuters Brasil, 2021.

Published

2025-03-31

How to Cite

LAWAND, Arthur Miguel Ferreira. The apparent regulatory conflict regarding the assessment of exposure to the hydrocarbon benzene in occupational environment activities: application of the quantitative or qualitative method?. Revista Brasileira de Direito Constitucional, [S. l.], v. 24, n. 2, p. 61–68, 2025. DOI: 10.62530/rbdcv24n02p61. Disponível em: https://www.rbdc.com.br/revista/article/view/375. Acesso em: 17 nov. 2025.